The estate of the Indian people of Canada is the most
important moral question in federal politics. The
responsibility flows directly to each of us as voters. This
book talks about what we, Canadians generally, can do to
understand this and what governments can do to discharge their
responsibilities.
The standard model for thinking about Indian policy is
fundamentally wrong, giving too much weight to the collective
and too little to the individual. It presumes and enforces a
relationship between the Indian individual and relevant
collectives (both Indian and state) that is biased against
individual freedom and choice. This relationship has produced
the adverse social outcomes-in health, education, life span,
incomes, housing, substance abuse, violence, imprisonment and
so on-universally criticized by all.
The relationship between the individual and the collective
has been the major force in human life from time immemorial but
the character of that relationship has evolved over time. In
one dark corner of this long drama, a special case of the
relationship between individual and collective has been playing
out in Canada in the lives of native Indians. In this
particular corner, the collective assumes an importance
unthinkable in the mainstream. Indian policy, imposed by the
mainstream on some Canadians-"Indians"-has built for them a
world that is both a fortress and a prison. The effects on the
individuals within that system have been profound.
I believe that there is a growing concern about this. If so,
there is an opening to a better future. But in spite of good
will, pernicious and counter-productive incentives remain to
burden an entire people, not just as trailing legacies of the
past but as current active goals of governments and other
entities in the system. The fatal defects in outcomes are not
redeemed by the fact that the intentions are in general of the
best. Some commentators will say-with reason-that this paper
challenges some of the most basic assumptions of established
Indian policy. This challenge would not be necessary if
established Indian policy was working well, for Indians or
anyone else.