Canada Post is a dinosaur that has lived far too long.
Only a monopoly protected by government can treat the public
the way it does. The cost of stamps for a first class
letter on January 11 went from 54 to 57 cents, for an increase
in 5.5 percent over a year in which consumer prices rose only
half that rate. Since 1971, when a stamp cost 7 cents,
the cost of mailing a letter has jumped by 714 percent while
general inflation was only 443 percent.
Such increases in the cost of postal services could perhaps
be justified if the quality of the service increased
correspondingly. But my own experiences suggest that the
opposite is the case. The first concerns Purolator, a
subsidiary of Canada Post. In the middle of
December upon returning from a business trip I learned from a
telephone message that I had to pick up a package at the local
Purolator office by the next day. If I did not do so, the
package would be returned to the sender. The package
contained tickets for Olympic events, which Purolator had known
long in advance would be sent to many people in Canada at that
time.
When I arrived at the Purolator office the next morning
shortly after it had opened at 8:30, a dozen people were
already lined up in front of me, waiting to be served by one
clerk. Within a short time, another half dozen people
joined the queue. I estimated that it would take
customers on average 30 minutes to be served by the single
employee behind the counter. Asked about more help, the
employee responded that another person would arrive "Within the
next half hour." Sure enough, around 9:15 a second
customer service agent leisurely walked into the office.
She held a copy of coffee in her hand and disappeared for
several minutes into another room before starting to serve
customers.
My second experience involved the Canada Post delivery
system: A Christmas letter arrived on January 11, after it had
been mailed in New York on December 9. The letter had
been returned to the sender because the address on the envelope
had been imperfect. It gave the correct name, street
address, town and postal code but it gave the wrong apartment
number, 2102 instead of 1202. The mail carrier obviously
could not be bothered to search for the correct mail box, at
which on average I receive 3 pieces of mail a day.
Instead, he or she made a big cross on the envelope and wrote
in bold letters "NO SUCH", leaving open the question whether
there is no such person, street address, town or apartment.
A final personal experience involved the shipment of books
to a university in Italy where I needed them for courses I was
teaching in the Spring of 2008. Canada Post charged $250
and the books arrived after 2.5 months. The same books
shipped back to Canada later that year cost $40 and arrived
after three weeks. It is puzzling that the cost and time
were so much better when my primary dealings were with the
Italian rather than the Canadian postal services.
Canada Post publicly justifies its record of price increases
by reference to a decrease in the volume of business, the cost
of mechanization and the need to serve more customers. No
one really knows whether this explanation is valid. Its
operation and accounting are simply too complex.
However, we do know from history that when governments
remove the protection of monopolies, costs drop and consumers
are serviced better. There are many reasons for this
result, but again history shows that the end of the monopoly is
accompanied by the loss of power by unions to extract high
levels of compensation, protect employees from the consequences
of poor performance and prevent the introduction of new
labour-saving technology. Management also becomes more
efficient and willing to resist union demands because
government policies no longer permit higher costs and poor
service to be passed on to consumers.
The argument that monopoly protection is needed so that
Canada Post can subsidize the services to customers living in
remote areas is bogus. After airline deregulation, remote
and small communities were serviced better and more cheaply by
unregulated airlines. If subsidies for some remote
locations are still needed, government should pay them directly
to private providers of first class mail services who won the
contract in a competitive bid.
Canadians have the right to buy their goods and services
from any supplier who offers them the best price and
service. The government has no right to force Canadians
into buying first class mail services from the monopoly Canada
Post. It is time for genuine competition in this
market.