Escalating housing costs continue to squeeze Torontonians. With a vacancy rate of around 1 per cent, average rent prices in the GTA rose 4.9 per cent over the last year. Provincial politicians living in Toronto took notice—their taxpayer-funded rental allowances increased by 20 per cent last fall due to high GTA rents.
Regardless of how one feels about the level of compensation politicians receive, there’s an important irony here—high and rising rents in and around Toronto are partly the result of government policy made by provincial politicians, including some who live in Toronto. The laws of supply and demand drive housing costs. With virtually nonexistent rental vacancies in the GTA, rental prices are increasing. In short, supply isn’t keeping up with demand.
So why isn’t enough rental housing getting built?
According to a recent report commissioned by the Canada Housing and Mortgage Corporation (CMHC), new rental development makes little economic sense in many Canadian cities, generating negative financial returns in most scenarios. For Toronto in particular, the high cost of land, high fees levied on developers and taxes (both provincial and local) drive those poor returns.
To make matters worse, rent controls, which the Wynne government expanded to include all new-builds, further eroded the incentive for developers to build rental housing. Although this policy was only in place for about a year before the Ford government scrapped it last fall, it almost certainly hurt the rental supply. Indeed, soon after the Wynne government announced the policy, thousands of rental units being built across the GTA were converted to condominiums, assuring builders a stronger more predictable return on investment.
To the current government’s credit, its reversal of damaging rent controls shows a degree of recognition that there’s a supply-demand imbalance and the need to encourage, not discourage, rental construction. Nevertheless, it’s likely that even a single year of rent control did lasting damage to the GTA rental market, both by halting projects that would otherwise enter the market, and by reminding developers of the uncertainty government can inject in the long-term feasibility of rental projects. It’s no wonder so many have chosen the relatively safe, short-term returns of condo development over the hassle of worrying whether future rent controls will limit the amount of rent that can be collected over decades.
So what more can be done to increase the supply of rental housing and increase affordability for renters? First, the high cost of land can be mitigated by allowing more units on residential lots. How? Zone for additional height or lot coverage, and relax zoning bylaws in single-family neighbourhoods to allow for secondary units (such as basement or laneway units) or the division of existing homes into duplexes or triplexes, as several U.S. cities and states have done.
Second, apartment buildings should receive better tax treatment. In 2018, Toronto property tax rates on multi-residential properties (including apartment buildings) were almost two-and-a-half times higher than rates for single-family homes. This is puzzling considering the strong case that apartment buildings consume less in local services (per unit) than lower-density building types. When planning long-term costs and revenues, rental developers certainly take this large disparity into account.
Third, it takes too long to build new housing—of any type—in the GTA. According to a survey of homebuilders published in 2016, it takes almost one-and-a-half years before shovels can break ground on new housing, with significant variation between projects and a good deal of uncertainty to boot. Every month of additional delays in obtaining approvals and permits prevents much-needed housing supply from hitting the market.
Politicians at Queen’s Park may be able to sidestep high GTA rents by simply upping rental allowances for MPPs. However, this is not an option for the region’s more than 700,000 renter households. As representatives of these residents, MPPs should forcefully tackle the rental housing shortage. Reversing the last government’s expansion of rent control was a good start but, clearly, much more work remains to be done.
Commentary
Politicians get rent relief—but what about the GTA's 700,000 renter households?
EST. READ TIME 4 MIN.Share this:
Facebook
Twitter / X
Linkedin
Escalating housing costs continue to squeeze Torontonians. With a vacancy rate of around 1 per cent, average rent prices in the GTA rose 4.9 per cent over the last year. Provincial politicians living in Toronto took notice—their taxpayer-funded rental allowances increased by 20 per cent last fall due to high GTA rents.
Regardless of how one feels about the level of compensation politicians receive, there’s an important irony here—high and rising rents in and around Toronto are partly the result of government policy made by provincial politicians, including some who live in Toronto. The laws of supply and demand drive housing costs. With virtually nonexistent rental vacancies in the GTA, rental prices are increasing. In short, supply isn’t keeping up with demand.
So why isn’t enough rental housing getting built?
According to a recent report commissioned by the Canada Housing and Mortgage Corporation (CMHC), new rental development makes little economic sense in many Canadian cities, generating negative financial returns in most scenarios. For Toronto in particular, the high cost of land, high fees levied on developers and taxes (both provincial and local) drive those poor returns.
To make matters worse, rent controls, which the Wynne government expanded to include all new-builds, further eroded the incentive for developers to build rental housing. Although this policy was only in place for about a year before the Ford government scrapped it last fall, it almost certainly hurt the rental supply. Indeed, soon after the Wynne government announced the policy, thousands of rental units being built across the GTA were converted to condominiums, assuring builders a stronger more predictable return on investment.
To the current government’s credit, its reversal of damaging rent controls shows a degree of recognition that there’s a supply-demand imbalance and the need to encourage, not discourage, rental construction. Nevertheless, it’s likely that even a single year of rent control did lasting damage to the GTA rental market, both by halting projects that would otherwise enter the market, and by reminding developers of the uncertainty government can inject in the long-term feasibility of rental projects. It’s no wonder so many have chosen the relatively safe, short-term returns of condo development over the hassle of worrying whether future rent controls will limit the amount of rent that can be collected over decades.
So what more can be done to increase the supply of rental housing and increase affordability for renters? First, the high cost of land can be mitigated by allowing more units on residential lots. How? Zone for additional height or lot coverage, and relax zoning bylaws in single-family neighbourhoods to allow for secondary units (such as basement or laneway units) or the division of existing homes into duplexes or triplexes, as several U.S. cities and states have done.
Second, apartment buildings should receive better tax treatment. In 2018, Toronto property tax rates on multi-residential properties (including apartment buildings) were almost two-and-a-half times higher than rates for single-family homes. This is puzzling considering the strong case that apartment buildings consume less in local services (per unit) than lower-density building types. When planning long-term costs and revenues, rental developers certainly take this large disparity into account.
Third, it takes too long to build new housing—of any type—in the GTA. According to a survey of homebuilders published in 2016, it takes almost one-and-a-half years before shovels can break ground on new housing, with significant variation between projects and a good deal of uncertainty to boot. Every month of additional delays in obtaining approvals and permits prevents much-needed housing supply from hitting the market.
Politicians at Queen’s Park may be able to sidestep high GTA rents by simply upping rental allowances for MPPs. However, this is not an option for the region’s more than 700,000 renter households. As representatives of these residents, MPPs should forcefully tackle the rental housing shortage. Reversing the last government’s expansion of rent control was a good start but, clearly, much more work remains to be done.
Share this:
Facebook
Twitter / X
Linkedin
Josef Filipowicz
Senior Fellow (On Leave)
Steve Lafleur
STAY UP TO DATE
More on this topic
Related Articles
By: Steven Globerman
By: Livio Di Matteo
By: Jock Finlayson
By: Steven Globerman
STAY UP TO DATE