Printer-friendly version

The Report Card on British Columbia's Secondary Schools: 2004 Edition collects a variety of relevant, objective indicators of school performance into one easily accessible, public document so that all interested parties - parents, school administrators, teachers, students, and taxpayers - can analyze and compare the performance of individual schools.

Printer-friendly version

In a recent survey of investment fund managers, respondents were asked to rank policy areas in order of their importance in fostering a positive investment climate. The top four of ten policy areas were all related to taxation: corporate income tax, personal income tax, corporate capital tax, and capital gains tax.

Printer-friendly version

The Report Card on Alberta's Elementary Schools: 2004 Edition collects a variety of relevant, objective indicators of school performance into one, easily accessible public document so that anyone can analyze and compare the performance of individual schools.

Printer-friendly version

The current state of the Canadian Forces (CF) is the result of political, not military, decisions undertaken over the past couple of decades. The decline in capability can be measured in terms of a decline in funding, of delayed replacement of obsolete and obsolescent equipment, of a high operational tempo, of declining numbers of personnel, of consequent low retention rates, and of many other indices.

Printer-friendly version

The evidence shows that, when compared to the province's total student population, the performance of Aboriginal students at even the highest ranked schools in this Report Card is barely average. On every indicator of academic performance at both the elementary and secondary levels, the results are the same.

Printer-friendly version

This book is a summary of the latest results of a Fraser Institute project that began in July, 1975. Its objective was to find out how much tax, in all forms, Canadians pay to federal, provincial, and municipal governments and how the size of this tax bill has changed over the years since 1961. In the interim, 12 editions of this book ahve been published.

Printer-friendly version

The government of Ontario updated its fiscal situation on December 17, 2003, after an initial estimate given by The Fraser Institute in September and generally confirmed by Erik Peters, the former Provincial Auditor, in October.
In the months since the Peters deficit estimate, the government has released many trial policy balloons in an effort to foreshadow possible measures to balance the budget. This Alert examines all of these measures and provides quantitative assessments of their fiscal impacts.
The fiscal framework used here has the same starting point as the government, but has slightly more conservative assumptions about future trends in revenues and expenditures. Specifically, it is assumed that:

  • Revenue grows at the same pace as nominal GDP.
  • The economy grows at 3 percent and inflation at 1.5 percent.
  • Population growth is taken from the Ministry of Finance median projection.
  • Program spending is based on a combination of inflation, population growth, and average real per capita annual increases since spending began growing again in 1998.
  • Capital spending is assumed to remain unchanged.
  • Any additions to debt are refinanced at a money market interest rate of 5 percent.
  • The budget reserve remains at $1 billion.

These assumptions are identical to those from the September 2003 Fraser Alert , State of emergency: Ontario's potential $4.5 billion deficit.