Search
Search results
-
IPCC relies on foregone conclusions to push preferred ‘climate’ narrative
Critical voices in climate research often struggle to be heard. ...
-
Advocates for 1.5°C warming target ignore climate science
On its first day in office, the Biden administration cancelled the Keystone XL pipeline. ...
-
1.5°C global warming target based on shaky science
The Trudeau government wants to ban gasoline-powered cars by 2035. ...
-
Off Target: The Economics Literature Does Not Support the 1.5°C Climate Ceiling
Many advocates of government intervention to curb greenhouse-gas emissions have called for a temperature ceiling on global warming. The consensus was originally 2 degrees Celsius, but advocates of more aggressive action succeeded in shifting the goal to 1 ...
-
Does climate change affect economic growth?
There was some evidence that warming up to 13.4 degrees Celsius is good for economic growth. ...
-
Climate ‘disclosure’—don’t take extreme slogans at face value
Start with official sources, check the data, read the expert literature and test the models. ...
-
IPCC uses worst-case scenario to exaggerate emission forecasts
Since the 1980s, ranges of projection were systematically too high. ...
-
Canada can manage the risks of reopening while pursuing growth and prosperity
The potential climatic warming effect of carbon dioxide was understood by the late-1800s. ...
-
Time to fight the climate extremists who seek to burn things down
Appeared in the Sudbury Star, February 10, 2020 Last year—2019—was the year the climate issue took a sharp turn towards extremism. Let’s hope 2020 is the year sanity makes a comeback. There have long been three groups occupying the climate issue. To avoid ...
-
Reality check—there’s no ‘climate emergency’ in Vancouver
Appeared in the Vancouver Sun, July 24, 2019 Recently, city councils in North Vancouver and West Vancouver declared a “climate emergency.” In doing so—unanimously, no less—they are the latest cities to jump on one of the most bizarre bandwagons of modern ...