Apples to Apples: Making Valid Cost-Benefit Comparisons in Climate Policy

— Jun 20, 2019

Apples to Apples: Making Valid Cost-Benefit Comparisons in Climate Policy finds that cost-benefit analysis is a powerful tool for guiding climate policy, but easily falls prey to common errors. For example, comparing the cost of an additional climate policy in Canada to the benefits of stopping all climate change.

Subscribe to the Fraser Institute

Get the latest news from the Fraser Institute on the latest research studies, news and events.

Recent Environment Commentaries and Blog Posts

B.C. floods expose hollow ‘emergency’ declarations

Ross McKitrick

Appeared in the National Post, November 23, 2021

The availability of fossil fuels now allows more effective emergency responses and life-saving rescue efforts.

Climate targets will make things worse for humanity

Robert P. Murphy

Appeared in the Calgary Sun, November 17, 2021

The standard climate literature does not justify the Paris Agreement's emission goals.

Politicians simply ignore cost-benefit analyses of ‘climate’ policy

Matthew Lau

Appeared in the Toronto Sun, October 30, 2021

Unfortunately, the estimated costs of the required emissions controls far surpass the environmental benefits.

Policymakers will ban fossil fuels at our peril

Pierre Desrochers, Joanna Szurmak

Quebec may soon ban all oil and natural gas development in the province.

Canadian governments should discard ‘climate policy’ stew and start over

Kenneth P. Green

Appeared in the Winnipeg Sun, October 13, 2021

Hard emission caps degrade the value of carbon taxes and regulations.

Ottawa and Washington peddling climate change alarmism

Matthew Lau

Appeared in the Calgary Sun, October 6, 2021

The federal government wants to conscript private capital to help fuel its climate agenda.

Ottawa’s climate plan ignores the science

Robert P. Murphy

Appeared in the Ottawa Sun, September 29, 2021

The prime minister supports a carbon tax that will max out at $170 per tonne in 2030.

New federal government should pursue less-painful climate plan

Elmira Aliakbari, Jairo Yunis

The Trudeau government’s climate plan has design flaws that will unnecessarily hurt Canada's economy.

IPCC relies on foregone conclusions to push preferred ‘climate’ narrative

Ross McKitrick

Appeared in the National Post, August 28, 2021

Critical voices in climate research often struggle to be heard.

Each party’s climate plan fails basic economics

Robert P. Murphy

Appeared in the Toronto Sun, August 25, 2021

So-called “clean” energy sources will not be able to entirely replace fossil fuels in the near term.

Research Experts

Elmira Aliakbari

Director, Natural Resource Studies, Fraser Institute
Pierre Desrochers

Associate Professor of Geography, University of Toronto
Glenn Fox

Professor of Agricultural Economics and Business, University of Guelph
Kenneth P. Green

Senior Fellow, Fraser Institute
Ross McKitrick

Professor of Economics, University of Guelph
Bruce Pardy

Professor of Law, Queen’s University
Mark Raymond

Professor of Economics, St. Mary's University
Cornelis "Kees" van Kooten

Professor of Economics, University of Victoria
Joel Wood

Associate Professor of Economics, Thompson Rivers University

Search form

Environment

Apples to Apples: Making Valid Cost-Benefit Comparisons in Climate Policy

Subscribe to the Fraser Institute

Research Experts