Study
| EST. READ TIME 1 MIN.Post-Stimulus Spending Trends in Canada
Canadian governments enacted Keynesian-inspired fiscal stimulus plans in 2009. These plans were to be a temporary response to the global economic recession. The stimulus spending was to be withdrawn after two years and program spending was then to be brought under control and returned to pre-stimulus trends.
However, Canadian governments did not withdraw their stimulus spending as quickly as promised and as a result have run budgetary deficits for longer and accumulated more public debt than they would otherwise have.
This research, which focuses on the post-stimulus spending trends for the federal government, Alberta, British Columbia, and Ontario, finds that these governments have delayed withdrawing their stimulus spending and pushed back initial projections for eliminating their budgetary deficits by at least two years.
These four governments have run larger and more protracted budgetary deficits than they would have if they withdrew stimulus spending and returned to pre-stimulus spending trends. The result is $63.5 billion in higher cumulative deficits and $2.9 billion in additional annual debt service costs that could have been avoided.
Share
-
Sean Speer
-
Joel Emes
Senior Economist, Fraser InstituteJoel Emes is a Senior Economist, Addington Centre for Measurement, at the Fraser Institute. Joel started his career with theFraser Institute and rejoined after a stint as a senior analyst, acting executive director and then senior advisor to British Columbia’s provincial government. Joel initiated and led several flagship projects in the areas of tax freedom and government performance, spending, debt, and unfunded liabilities. He supports many projects at the Institute in areas such as investment, equalization, school performance and fiscal policy. Joel holds a B.A. and an M.A. in economics from Simon Fraser University.… Read more Read Less…
Related Topics
Related Articles
By: Jake Fuss and Grady Munro
By: Jake Fuss and Grady Munro