Study
| EST. READ TIME 2 MIN.Federal Delays in Approving New Medicines 2013
This study measures delays in the approval of new medicines by Health Canada and provides patients with the information they need in order to determine whether the time they wait for access to new medicines in Canada is unnecessarily long.
Our findings reveal that Canadian approval delays are not insignificant. The most recent estimates calculated show that Health Canada took a median of 355 days to issue a notice of compliance for patented medicines in 2011?an improvement from the 448 days it took in 2010. Between 2007 and 2011, Canadians could generally expect a delay of nearly a year or more for access to new medicines after submission for approval. That delay was longer than experienced in Europe for most years during that period. It was also longer than experienced under the US FDA for between two and four of the five years studied.
While the requirement for governmental approval for sale is not unique to Canada, the process can add further delays for Canadians seeking treatment from these new medicines. An important question that arises from this comparison is the value of duplicating the application of safety standards between jurisdictions. Given the similarity of international safety standards and the relatively small size of the population served by Health Canada?s mandatory approval process, Canada?s federal government could improve access to new medicines through international harmonization and mutual recognition agreements.
Share
-
Bacchus Barua
Director, Health Policy Studies, Fraser InstituteBacchus Barua is Director of the Fraser Institute’s Centre for Health Policy Studies. He completed his BA (Honours) in Economicsat the University of Delhi (Ramjas College) and received an MA in Economics from Simon Fraser University. Mr. Barua has conducted research on a range of key health-care topics including hospital performance, access to new pharmaceuticals, the sustainability of health-care spending, the impact of aging on health-care expenditures, and international comparisons of health-care systems. He also designed the Provincial Healthcare Index (2013), co-led the creation of Comparing Performance of Universal Health Care Countries (2016) and co-authored the Fraser Institute’s annual survey of wait times, Waiting Your Turn, for over a decade (2010–2022). In 2022, Bacchus was invited to provide testimony as part of a panel of witnesses for the House of Commons Standing Committee on Health (HESA). Mr. Barua is a frequent commentator on radio and television, and his articles have appeared in well-known news outlets including the National Post, Wall Street Journal, Globe and Mail, Maclean’s, and forbes.com.… Read more Read Less… -
Nadeem Esmail
Senior Fellow, Fraser InstituteNadeem Esmail is a Senior Fellow of the Fraser Institute. He first joined the Fraser Institute in 2001, served asDirector of Health System Performance Studies from 2006 to 2009, and has been a Senior Fellow since 2010. Mr. Esmail has spearheaded critical Fraser Institute research including the annual Waiting Your Turn survey of surgical wait times across Canada and How Good Is Canadian Health Care?, an international comparison of health care systems. In addition, Mr. Esmail has authored or co-authored more than 30 comprehensive studies and more than 150 articles on a wide range of topics including the cost of public health care insurance, international comparisons of health care systems, hospital performance, medical technology, and physician shortages. A frequent commentator on radio and TV, Mr. Esmail's articles have appeared in newspapers across North America. Mr. Esmail completed his B.A. (Honours) in Economics at the University of Calgary and received an M.A. in Economics from the University of British Columbia.… Read more Read Less…
Related Topics
Related Articles
By: Dr. Jehangir Appoo, Glen Sumner and Aria S. Appoo
By: Jerome Gessaroli
By: Matthew Lau