old age security

Canada must prepare for our aging population

The Trudeau government’s policy reversal will cost an estimated additional $10.4 billion in 2030.

Printer-friendly version
The Age of Eligibility for Public Retirement Programs in the OECD


  • All industrialized countries, particularly those in the OECD and including Canada, are experiencing an aging of their populations.
  • Of the 22 high-income OECD countries apart from Canada, 18 of them (over 80 percent) (Australia, Austria, Belgium, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Japan, Korea, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Portugal, Spain, the United Kingdom, and the United States) are enacting increases in the age of eligibility for public retirement programs.
  • Thirteen countries, or almost 60 percent (Australia, Belgium, Denmark, France, Germany, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Spain, the United Kingdom, and the United States) are increasing their age of eligibility for public retirement programs to 67 years old or older; 2 of these (Ireland and the United Kingdom) are moving to 68 years, and Iceland is moving to 70 years.
  • Five countries are indexing their age of eligibility with life expectancy, meaning that the age of eligibility will be automatically adjusted as life expectancy changes.
  • Four countries in addition to Canada are retaining the status quo with no reforms: Luxembourg, Norway, Sweden, and Switzerland.
  • In 2015, Canada’s federal government reversed a 2012 reform that would have increased the age of eligibility for Old Age Security and the Guaranteed Income Supplement to 67 by 2029. The federal government estimates that this policy reversal will cost $10.4 billion in 2030.

Canada’s aging population will strain government coffers

Health-care costs are expected to increase by 57 per cent by 2045.

Printer-friendly version
Canada’s Aging Population and Implications for Government Finances

Despite broad public awareness that our society is aging, very little has been done by governments across the country to prepare for the marked aging that has already begun. This study examines the fiscal pressures, specifically the demand for greater spending on seniors-related programming coupled with a weakened ability to generate tax revenues, that governments will face for the foreseeable future from an aging population.

Data abounds illustrating the aging of our population. Statistics Canada estimates that from 2010 to 2063, the seniors’ share of Canada’s population will increase from a little under 15 percent to over 25 percent.

Similarly, unlike most of the period from the early 1970s through to 2010 (or so), labour force participation is now expected to decline. Indeed, expectations are that labour force participation will return to its pre-1970s level by mid-century. More specifically, from 2017 to 2063, Canada’s labour force participation rate is expected to fall from about 65 percent to 61 per­cent. This decline is akin to millions of fewer Canadians participating in the labour force.

This decline in labour force participation will adversely affect growth in per-capita income. Per-capita income grew, on average, by 1.3 percent between 1981 and 2016. However, expectations for the 2017 to 2045 period are that per-capita income will grow by only 0.9 percent, and almost the entirety of this decline in growth is expected to be due to lower labour force participation. The lower rates of per-capita income growth will mean the economy in general will grow more slowly, making it harder for government to collect revenues compared to its current capacity.

This slowdown in per-person income and economic growth more broadly comes at the same time that governments will face pressure for higher spending on a wide range of programs. This study examines both health care spending and income transfer programs to seniors.

Health care spending on a per-person basis is heavily skewed towards a person’s first year of life (birth and related) and their retirement years (post 65). For instance, in 2014, the latest year of available data, the average per-person government spending on health care for Canadians between the ages of 15 and 64 was $2,664. Compare that to the cost for those 65 and over who had average annual per-capita health care costs of $11,625, which was 4.4 times greater than the 15–64 average. The higher proportion of Canadians expected to be in the over-65 category means higher and higher health care costs.

In addition to increased health care spending, an aging population will also require governments to direct more resources to senior income transfer programs like Old Age Security (OAS) and the Guaranteed Income Supplement (GIS). Currently, spending on these programs costs about $48.3 billion, which represents 2.4 percent of GDP. In 2045, spending on Elderly Benefits is projected to be approximately 1.1 to 1.2 percentage points of GDP higher than in 2017. This means that Elderly Benefits will represent between 3.5 and 3.6 percent of GDP by 2045, an increase of 47.0 percent from 2017. Using 2016 nominal GDP figures, the latest year for which we have complete data, this increase would be equivalent to $22.6 billion more being spent on Elderly Benefits.

Simply put, population aging will contribute to a large increase in future levels of government spending. When combined, projected government spending increases related to health care and Elderly Benefits are expected to be 5.3 percentage points of GDP higher in 2045 compared to 2017. In dollar terms, this additional spending would be equivalent to an increase of $107.1 billion using 2016 nominal GDP figures.

To illustrate the potential size of the looming fiscal imbalance, the study includes an analysis of probable revenues (conservatively estimated) with higher spending on health care and income transfer programs to seniors. Based on certain assumptions, by 2045, it is projected that there will be a 7.1 percent of GDP gap between government revenues and expenditures, in other words a deficit. For perspective, government deficits in 2016 would have been more than $143 billion based on 7.1 percent of GDP. Depending on interest rate assumptions, the accumulation of debt over this period could be substantial. The estimates in the paper of debt accumulation by Canadian governments range between 170 percent and 250 percent of GDP.

These rather worrying fiscal outcomes are not inevitable. Proactive steps can and should be undertaken to reform program spending and encour­age stronger economic growth, both of which would mitigate the adverse effects from the aging of our population that are outlined in this paper.

Calls for More Policy Reversals

Reversing course and raising the age of eligibility for retirement benefits to 67 from 65 would be politically costly, but it makes eminent sense when one considers the aging of our population.

Myth: Canada has a retirement income crisis

This sea change in labour-force behaviour of older workers was completely unanticipated by research into pension adequacy.

Liberal government’s first budget largely avoids difficult decisions

For the most part, the government did not decide to reform or cut low-priority spending or ineffective programs.

Subscribe to RSS - old age security